The Sony a7C II (B&H Photo Video/Amazon/Adorama) and Nikon Zf ( B&H Photo Video/Adorama/Amazon) are two of the latest and most advanced full frame mirrorless cameras on the market. With both featuring lightweight, compact bodies and a range of cutting-edge features, they make compelling options for enthusiasts and professionals alike.
In this in-depth comparison, we’ll examine how these two powerhouse models stack up across a range of specifications including resolution, autofocus, video capabilities, design, and more. While the Sony touts a higher resolution 33MP sensor compared to the 25MP chip in the Nikon, the Zf counters with faster burst shooting at 14fps vs 10fps. Both offer extensive video features including 4K/60p recording and five-axis stabilization, while the Nikon adds N-Log for greater dynamic range during capture.
Design-wise, the a7C II retains its predecessor’s compact form factor while the Zf opts for a chunkier build with a deeper grip. Weather-sealing gives the Sony an edge for outdoor use. Diving deeper, we’ll compare their autofocus systems, ISO ranges, LCDs and EVF, memory cards slots, battery performance, wireless connectivity and numerous other parameters.
With such stiff competition between these two models, the final decision for users will come down to individual needs and preferences. But by exploring this comprehensive spec-by-spec showdown, you’ll get a clear sense of all these two impressive cameras have to offer.
| Specification | Sony a7C II | Nikon Zf |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Resolution | 33MP | 25MP |
| Sensor Size | Full Frame CMOS | Full Frame BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor Design | BSI | BSI |
| Image Stabilization | 5-axis sensor-shift, 7 stops | Sensor-shift, 8 stops |
| Max ISO | 204,800 (expanded) | 204,800 (expanded) |
| Native ISO Range | 100-51,200 | 64-25,600 |
| Dust Reduction | Yes | Yes |
| AA Filter | No | No |
| AF Points | 759 phase/contrast-detect | 273 phase/contrast-detect |
| AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Tracking, Face/Eye Detection | Single, Continuous, Tracking, Face/Eye Detection |
| AF Assistance | Yes | Yes |
| AF Acquisition | 0.02 sec | 0.05 sec |
| Control Dial | 2 | 1 |
| LCD Screen | 3″ fully articulated, 1.04M dots | 3.2″ fully articulated, 2.1M dots |
| Touch Screen | Yes | Yes |
| Viewfinder | 0.7x mag, 2.36M dots | 0.8x mag, 3.69M dots |
| Diopter Adjustment | -4 to +3 | -4 to +2 |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/8000s (electronic), 1/4000s (mechanical) | 1/8000s |
| Flash Sync Speed | 1/160s | 1/200s |
| Flash Modes | Off, auto, fill, rear sync | Off, front sync, rear sync, red-eye reduction |
| Flash Compensation | -3 to +3 EV | -3 to +1 EV |
| Continuous Shooting | 10fps | 14fps |
| Buffer Size | 76 compressed RAW | 35 compressed RAW |
| Video Resolution | Up to 4K 60p, 10-bit 4:2:0 | Up to 4K 60p, 10-bit 4:2:2 |
| Video Codec | XAVC S, XAVC HS | H.264/H.265 |
| Log Recording | No | N-Log |
| Storage Media | 1x SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-II | 1x SD UHS-II, 1x Micro SD UHS-I |
| USB Version | USB 3.2 Gen 1 | USB 3.2 Gen 1 |
| Wi-Fi/Bluetooth | Yes/Yes | Yes/Yes |
| Battery Life (CIPA) | 540 shots | 380 shots |
| Weight with Battery | 514g | 710g |
| Dimensions | 124 x 71 x 63mm | 144 x 103 x 49mm |
Conclusion:
After closely comparing the specifications and features of the Sony a7C II and Nikon Zf, there are strong cases to be made for both cameras. The Sony shines for its compact, lightweight body design making it highly portable. With 5-axis stabilization rated for 7 stops and no recording limits, it’s also ideal for handheld video. Nikon counters with faster burst shooting at 14fps, a higher resolution EVF, and the ability to output pristine 10-bit 4:2:2 video externally.
For stills, the a7C II’s higher resolution 33MP sensor delivers more detail, but the Zf’s lower pixel count could mean better high ISO performance. Both offer advanced autofocus with face/eye detection. Weather-sealing on the Sony also makes it more durable for outdoor use.
Ultimately, Sony users wanting a compact full frame model with stellar video capabilities will be well served by the a7C II. Nikon shooters wanting the best possible still image quality in a familiar design can’t go wrong with the Zf. But either camera makes for an outstanding choice that won’t disappoint. Carefully weighing your needs will determine which model fits best.